![]() |
||
|
Your one stop source for Bass Tournament information! |
||
|
Please Use Your Back Button to Return |
||
| HOME | ||
|
Submit Your Article for Posting! |
||
|
.
This
event started on October 26th 2006 and ended on October 28th.
The stats show that we had 134 anglers, who managed to catch
192 bass. Over the 3 days
not one 5 fish limit was brought to the scales. To say this was a
tough tournament is an understatement.
Congratulations to Brad Leifermann who won the tournament with
31.5 pounds of hard to catch bass. Now
that the event is over I thought it would be interesting to get some
feed back from the top 5 finishers, so I contacted all 5 and asked the
same four questions of each. I
intentionally kept the questions quite broad, as I did not wish to
make anyone uncomfortable about giving away too much information. The questions: 1.)
What
was your very first impression on this body of water? 2.)
What
pattern did you finally decide was best and why? 3.)
What
was your biggest surprise about fishing this body of water? 4.)
What
was your final impression of this body of water? Brad Leifermann - 1.)
Brad
thought that Patoka had all the qualities to make a great bass
fishery. It has trees,
submergent vegetation and lay-downs to target. The forage base seemed
to be comprised of mainly bluegills and shad.
There is in-shore and offshore structure consisting of humps,
creek channels, great drop-offs and expansive shallow water flats. 2.)
From
his past experience fishing fall regional Redman tournaments on lakes
Truman and 3.)
The
lake was easy to navigate, the danger areas well marked and if you ran
in the creek channels, even in this low water, you were pretty safe.
Brad was surprised at the tough bite and surprised at the lack of
short fish, even though the lake has a slot limit. 4.)
A very
beautiful and well-managed lake. The
bass population seems small and there appears to be an imbalance
between large fish and small fish Dean Capra - 1.)
Dean
thought Patoka fished a lot like a lake.
There were weed beds, wood, both standing and submerged.
The distinct drop-offs and points also fished similar to a
lake. 2.)
Because
there were no schooling fish, Dean just covered lots of water. 3.)
Biggest
surprise is when the water rose up overnight and got muddy. 4.)
Dean
thought the lake fished very tough, it was not a lot of fun to fish
under these conditions and turned out to be a lot of hard work. Marc Kinnelly –
Frederick, MD. 1.)
Marc’s
first impression of the lake was that the bass population was small
and it was going to be very difficult to pattern fish.
On the first day of practice he did not get a single bite. 2.)
During
the tournament Marc fished small pockets or cuts off the main lake
that had wind blowing into them. He
used small buzz-baits and spinner-baits during the tournament.
Each pocket gave up only one fish and the pattern became one of
running and gunning during the whole tournament. Only one fish came
from a pocket fished during the practice days. 3.)
Marc’s
biggest surprise was the need to purchase a boat permit to fish this
lake. 4.)
Under
different conditions Marc thought Patoka might be a good lake to fish.
He felt the average size of fish caught was large, but thin and
few in numbers. Brady Farrell – 1.)
Brady’s
first impression of the reservoir was that it looked really good.
There was deep-water structure, roadbeds, grass beds, timber,
(both standing and submerged). There
should be any number of techniques that would work.
Brady had some concern about fall turn over as the water
temperature was hovering around 57 degrees and the color of the water
seemed to indicate that the lake had turned over already.
During the practice days Brady never got more than one or two
bites on any one technique. 2.)
Brady
decided that cranking deep grass edges would be the strongest pattern
for the tournament. During
practice Brady was getting some quality bites on the deep grass edges
using plastics, but because of the low number of bites felt that power
fishing with cranks would allow him to cover more water and up his
bite percentage. Even
though Brady had more bites up the river, he felt that this area would
get too much pressure during the tournament and decide to fish less
pressure areas. Brady
stayed with a Rapala DT-10 during the tournament, throwing it in the
grass and ripping it out, generating reaction bites. He looked for the
greener grass or grass next to deep water.
Brady got two bites each day, never lost a fish and got a
couple of quality fish into the boat. 3.)
He was
surprised that a lake with this much structure and grass did not
surrender more fish. Brady
said it was like musky fishing and he was surprised every time he got
a fish. This was very
difficult fishing. Basically
you just had to grind it out all day long. 4.)
Brady’s
final impression is probably the same as a lot of ours. There should
just be a higher population of fish when you have quality habitat like
that. Also, he felt the
lake needs a stronger forage base.
And finally felt the lake fished extremely difficult as a
boater and would have hated to fish it as a non-boater. Thomas Borkowski – Savage,
Mn. 1.)
Tom
thought the lake looked beautiful and would like to see more lakes
looking like Patoka Reservoir. 2.)
During
practice Tom found that loud black buzzers worked the best. During the
tournament he fished them for the first few hours each day, then
switched to a black/blue jig and pig combination.
Tom fished each day with 8-10 rods on the deck and used most of
them during the tournament day. 3.)
Like
most of us Tom was surprised that the reservoir seems to have a very
low bass population. 4.)
Tom
likes Patoka Reservoir, both how it looks and the way it fishes. Wayne Ek is a fishing guide, tournament angler and writer in |
||
|
|
||